⏰🗺️ History For Inspirations Junayedmn1

  494 https://parg.co/bCDM ) Historical views. (ঐতিহাসিক মতামত।) - Written by Junayed Ashrafur Rahman https://parg.co/bfva ✒  "History is never distorted if rational historical opinions are given."  #History #Wisdom #Politics  There are many incidents in history for which the real cause has not been described. Everyone gives different comments and opinions about such incidents. If the view of such an event is reasonable, it will never distort history. 🌟 For example, Emperor Akbar ascended the throne as a boy and dismissed General Bairam Khan. There may be many opinions on this incident. Now if opinion is given, Emperor Akbar was a super genius. So in Bairam Khan he found some faults which were very complex to be perceived by the common people. So Bairam Khan was dismissed by Emperor Akbar. - Giving such an opinion will never distort history. 🌟 As I wrote in my novel "In the Forest of Assam", General Aurora defeated the Pak army and went back to India. Because h

 493 https://parg.co/bCDM ) Exaggeration and distortion of history. (ইতিহাসের অতিরঞ্জন ও বিকৃতি।) - Written by Junayed Ashrafur Rahman https://parg.co/bfva ✒  "Both exaggeration and distortion obscure the correct history." #History #Wisdom #Politics  History is when you describe what happened in the past. But an exaggerated description of an event that did not happen or something that happened is no longer history. 🌟 For example: - Isha Khan formed a separate independent state with some zamindars of East Bengal. - It's history. 🌟 But if it is said, Isha Khan was a greater ruler than Emperor Akbar. So Isha Khan defeated Emperor Akbar in a direct battle and established a larger empire than the Mughal Empire. - It would be an exaggeration of history. 🌟 If it is said again, Isha Khan was the zamindar of East Bengal, but he was basically a bandit chief. Subsequent looting, land grabbing and abduction of women were his real occupations. - It would be a distortion of histor